Travel between work and home consumes about 3 hours of my
life everyday. It also gives me about 3 hours everyday to listening to music
actively. Active meaning, I play it to listen to it and do nothing
else, only listen to that music with activities like walking or travelling on
the side. A lot of this active instrumental
music has been much fascinating me lately. It makes me wonder, how do wordy names emerge for tunes that
were created to escape from the burden of words and translation?
This piece by Tigran Hamasyan is a song that flows like a slow
stream of water that smoothly begins to evaporate into nothingness. He’s done this
with a faint vocal section that begins in a structured fashion but then transforms into a fading poly rhythmic
form that dissolves into itself, soon enough, quite like vague memories that fade away to feel like dreams. He’s one of those artists I listen to without even looking at what each song
is called, and I check out names only once in a while. I saw the name ‘A
memory that became a dream’ today evening. The awareness of the name really transformed
my experience of the song. There was joy in how closely I had sensed the
artists’ vision, a success of his capacity to articulate an idea and my
capacity to absorb (to some extent, maybe).
I heard Arjuna (the two part composition) by
Tarun Balani for the first time at a small private concert in 2013. Tarun announced the name the piece
and the band performed it. Then I went home and heard the song on the album
again and again. And again. Upbeat music that changes gears between
the two parts to charge at you more definitively; this is a
great demonstration of building up focus with a change in time signature, rigorous and meditative repetition, and slowly revealing the
true nature of something through its journey. To me, this song could be called nothing but Arjuna. I cannot imagine for it to have
any other name now. How much would change if I would have not heard its name before
listening to the song? It would still stand for focus, perhaps, but not in the
context of its Mahabharata reference. Would the piece be different if Tarun had
never read or heard about Arjuna or the Mahabharata?
I’m trying to resolve my feeling about the times where I have felt little
connection with the artists’ intentions and found my experience of a song to be quite
different from its intended meaning. This happened especially in the case of the riveting Piano Textures by Bruno Sanfillipo. The tracks are organized in an order and are called Piano Textures 1, Piano Textures 2, Piano
Textures 3, Piano Textures 4, Piano Textures 5, Piano Textures 6, Piano
Textures 7, Piano Textures 8.
PS. Hunting for relevant pieces for this made me realize how live versions could often be diametrically different from studio versions. It is Jazz after all. It is all the energy in the improvisation.
PPS. Happy 2014.
PPS. Happy 2014.
:)
ReplyDelete